Best Nas For Mac 2015

Over time, the distribution of Mac OS versions among Mac users changes as new versions of the OS are released, old Macs are retired, and new models arrive that only support the most recent version. Today we’re looking at six years worth of data.

Bear in mind that this reflects visitors to lowendmac.com and is probably not reflective of the percentages of each version visiting a general interest site. That said, trends for each OS version should be similar.

JPL: “Once again, best practice in backup protocol dictates you should have three copies of your library. One, the library you use daily. Two, a locally accessible copy kept on a NAS or USB HDD. The NAS is useful here for its ability to perform scheduled backups you don’t have to think about it when adding new content to the library. The first graph shows the distribution of each version of Mac OS X on Intel-based Macs since OS X 10.4 Tiger over the period of October 2009 through September 2015. During that time, only one version of OS X has totally dominated the user base for an appreciable amount of time.

The first graph shows the distribution of each version of Mac OS X on Intel-based Macs since OS X 10.4 Tiger over the period of October 2009 through September 2015. During that time, only one version of OS X has totally dominated the user base for an appreciable amount of time.

Tiger (introduced in April 2005, the first version of OS X for Intel Macs, and on the market for a record 2-1/2 years) was already down to 5% of those visiting lowendmac.com using Intel Macs, and OS X 10.5 Leopard – then two years old – was at 35% in October 2009.

Already at 62% share, OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard was in the ascent, having come to market in August 2009. It was the first version of OS X exclusive to Intel Macs, and users upgraded to it from Tiger and Leopard in droves. By the time it was replaced in July 2011, it had 83% share among Intel Mac users visiting Low End Mac. With nearly two years as the current OS X version, it takes second place only to Tiger in that department.

Starting in 2011, Apple made developer preview versions and sometimes also beta versions of the next revision of OS X available months before they were released to the public. Because of this, you’ll see a short low tail prior to release, and then the graph takes a big jump upward.

OS X 10.7 Lion arrived in July 2011, and there were some big changes in store for users. First of all, those with Core Duo and Core Solo Macs couldn’t use it, marking the first time a version of OS X had left behind any Intel Macs. Secondly, Lion no longer supported Rosetta, Apple’s technology that let Intel Macs continue to run PowerPC software. For those using AppleWorks or older versions of Microsoft Office, Photoshop, etc., it meant upgrading would not be cheap – adding the cost of OS X and software updates.

Regardless, within a couple months Lion had cut Snow Leopard’s share to below 50%, and Lion itself reached the 55% mark among user before it was replaced by the next big cat.

You’ll also notice in the graph that after an initial spike in the percentage of users, there is always a brief drop as some users choose to go back to an earlier version of OS X.

OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion, introduced in July 2012, also raised the hardware bar, and we are very fortunate that every version of OS X since has had the same system requirements. Mountain Lion cut Lion use in half almost immediately, and within a few months there were more OS X 10.6 users visiting Low End Mac than 10.7 users. From that point through the present, Lion has fallen further and further behind Snow Leopard, which remains surprisingly strong overall.

Mountain Lion peaked at 65%, then dipped a bit thanks to the heavily promoted OS X 10.9 Mavericks public beta. Mavericks was released in October 2013 as a free upgrade from OS X 10.6, 10.7, and 10.8, and it zoomed past the 50% mark in short order. With the same hardware requirements as 10.8 Mountain Lion, every Mountain Lion user could potentially make the switch – and for free.

Mavericks was one of only two versions of OS X to pass the 65% mark among users (based on our site stats), and it also had the highest adoption rate of any version of OS X for Intel Macs.

OS X 10.10 Yosemite was even more successful during its public beta period, but it didn’t take off as quickly as Mavericks had, nor did it reach the same level among users, topping out at 58% before OS X 10.11 El Capitan arrived to take its place as king of the OS X hill.

The next graph takes a different look at the same data. Each version of OS X is stacked on the previous one to display the data.

Yes, this graph pays homage to the colors of the original Apple logo.

By their width, you can see that OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard and 10.8 Mountain Lion were the “current” version of OS X longer than were Lion and Mavericks. More than that, you can readily see how use of OS X 10.4 Tiger and 10.5 Leopard has faded away over time, both are now in the 2% range.

At present, OS X 10.10 Mavericks has the lion’s share among users at 58%, although that will change as this is El Capitan’s first full month on the market. In second place, although barely, is OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard, with 10.9 Mavericks just behind it – both at about 12%.

OS X 10.7 Lion comes in next at about 7%, most of those are probably users who cannot upgrade to OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion and later.

OS X 10.11 El Capitan has already surpassed Mountain Lion for the month of September 2012 – despite the fact that it was released on the last day of the month. Both 10.11 and 10.8 are at roughly 4%.

What About PowerPC Macs?

Over the six years of data we have, PowerPC Macs have gone from being 30% of our Mac users to now reaching the 10% mark. It’s not that a lot of old Macs are no longer in use, only that Apple has sold a heck of a lot more Intel Macs year after year, while the number of PowerPC Macs in service can do nothing but decline as they age.

Over the past six years, the percentage of PowerPC Mac users visiting lowendmac.com using OS X has had a remarkably even breakdown.

• 41% are using OS X 10.5 Leopard on their G4 and G5 Macs, with a low of 36% in /ate 2009/early 2010 to a high of 48% in 2012/13.
• 46% are using OS X 10.4 Tiger on their G3, G4, and G5 Macs, with numbers fluctuating between 43% and 50%.
• Overall, 14% are using earlier versions of OS X, with a high of 21% in 2010 and a low of 9% in late 2014/early 2015.

We don’t include PPC versions of OS X in our charts because they are a different market segment. As far as software development goes, PPC is practically dead in the water.

TenFourFox (TFF), a fork of the latest extended release revision (ESR) of Firefox optimized for G3, G4, and G5 chips, is the only ongoing software project. It supports both Tiger and Leopard, and it runs very nicely – especially on G4 and G5 Macs, where it can use the AltiVec velocity engine. TenFourFox supports HTML5 and JavaScript, although it does leave Flash behind (to which many say good riddance). Most YouTube videos will run just fine with TFF.

Dblue glitch vst free download mac. Yes, you read it right. You can run ESR version 38.3 of Firefox on your old PPC Macs that have OS X 10.4 and 10.5 installed. It just has a different name, but it works the same. Even most Firefox add-ons will work!

That’s a huge step forward from the official Mac PowerPC version of Firefox for Tiger and Leopard, which ceased development at version 3.6.28 in 2012.

And What About Core Duo Macs?

Although newer versions of OS X have really upped the hardware requirements, OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard remains a solid option for those using Core Duo Macs with 2 GB of system memory or older, slower Macs with 2-4 GB. I’m writing this on a Mid 2007 Mac mini, a Core 2 Duo machine with 3 GB of RAM, and it has been running Snow Leopard very nicely for years – even moreso since I replaced a failing hard drive with a 250 GB Samsung 850 EVO SSD.

Although OS X Tiger and Leopard will run with less memory, they are far more outdated than Snow Leopard. Best of all, with Snow Leopard you can still run PowerPC software and possibly the current version of Google’s Chrome browser, the second most popular browser on Macs – if you have a Core 2 Duo Mac. (32-bit Core Duo Macs are not supported on Chrome 39 and later, but you can still download Chrome 38 Final for these Macs.)

You can run the current version of Firefox on any Mac running Snow Leopard.

More Browser Options for PPC and Core Duo Macs

Safari for OS X 10.4, 10.5, and 10.6 is very dated. Look at Firefox and Chrome as the best options to start looking for a more current browser. You might also want to consider these:

Opera has been around since 1995, making it one of the oldest browsers still in production. For Tiger or Leopard on PPC, you want version 10.63. With Intel and Tiger, you can run Opera 11. Intel and Leopard lets you run Opera 12. And if you’re running OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard or newer, you can run Opera 25. (The current release is version 32. All versions from 26 forward require OS X 10.7 Lion.)

OmniWeb was the first browser for Mac OS X, ported over from the NeXT version. The current release version is 5.11.2, which requires OS X 10.4.8 or later and supports both PPC and Intel.

I’ve become a real fan of Stainless, a multithreaded Mac browser that supports parallel sessions in different tabs or windows. You can even log into the same website with different IDs in different windows. It hasn’t been updated since 2013, but it runs nicely on OS X 10.5 and later, even on PowerPC Macs.

Camino is even older than Stainless. It started out as a port of Mozilla to Mac OS X, and it ended development with version 2.1.2 in March 2012. It runs very nicely on OS X 10.4 and later, and it’s quick so long as you only have a few tabs or windows open.

Shiira is another discontinued project (2009). It supports OS X 10.4.8 and later, so it’s an option. It was designed for speed.

iCab has an unusual history, being based on the CAB browser for Atari ST computers. Unlike the others, it’s $20 shareware that you can use for free for a limited time. I’ve been using it on and off since 1999, and . Version 2.9.9 supports the Classic Mac OS on 680×0 Macs running Mac OS 7.5 to 8.1. Version 3.0.5 (2008) requires a PowerPC processor and Mac OS 7.5 to 9.2.2. There is also a version 3.0.5 for OS X 10.1.5 to 10.5.

For the audience of this article, iCab 4.9 (2012) works with OS X 10.3.9 through 10.4.11, and 5.1.1 (2013) supports OS X 10.5 through 10.7. Those using OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard should consider iCab 5.2 (2014), which is compatible up to OS X 10.9.

Keywords: #macosxusershare #osxusershare #macosusershare

Short link: http://goo.gl/T6BR2M

searchword: osxusershare

The Plex is a media server, which will store all of your media in one place. The noticeable part of Plex is you can access all of the media from anywhere on any device. You need to sign up and download, and after that, you can add your media and stream and manage your content with an easy interface. To access Plex media, download the application on the device and enjoy it from anywhere anytime.

The Plex is developing the system day-by-day and increases its compatibility over more and more platforms. What is NAS, probably you all know that why we use NAS? NAS is used for storing our data and media, and it is just like a server through which we can store and access our files. Some of the Plex compatible NAS are mentioned below which will require you to save videos and movies to a considerable extent.

we are happy to help you, submit this Form, if your solution is not covered in this article.

Get More: Best NAS drives for Mac

List of the Best NAS for Plex Media Server Transcoding

NAS for Plex Media Server List: Qnap, TerraMaster, NETGEAR, Synology, ASUSTOR

#1- NETGEAR: Top NAS FOR Plex media server

Are you looking for high-performance NAS which can work correctly with Plex? Then Netgear’s this NAS is the best with 2xfaster application processing with 64-Bit technology and Intel 1.5 GHz Dual-Core processor. It is ideal for storing data for creative professionals, K-12 and business with a significant storage requirement.

An excellent transcoding power distinguishes it from series 300 and 400. The Plex is running outstanding and much faster compared to its previous model. You can also see so many users have responded positively regarding NAS performance.

Buy: Check Price on Amazon

#2- TerraMaster: Good NAS for PLEX Media Server

TerraMaster NAS is designed with powerful hardware and all new latest technology. You can install up to 4 SATA hard drive (3.5”) of 12TB which means you can use to extend the storage up to 48TB. It supports various media servers like Plex server, iTunes and DLNA/UPNP protocol.

More, you can stream media through a smart TV or mobile devices or set-top box. The efficient and reliable aluminum body controls heat dissipation and low noise.

Buy: Check Price on Amazon

#3- QNAP – NAS for Plex Server to buy in 2020

Prevent data loss and increase your storage with QNAP media transcodingNAS. With the high-performance Intel 2.41GHz Dual-Core, you can transcode even 1080P videos offline on it. It also integrates significantly with Plex and offers outstanding access to media around the world.

Radio silence mac keygen torrent download. QNAP is compatible with multiple operating systems like Linux, Unix, Windows and more. Different storage options are available in this NAS you can get one as per your need.

Buy: Check price on Amazon

#4- Synology: A Solid NAS hardware to Run Plex Server

To run Plex on this NAS, you have to download a sinology package from the Plex website and after that, it will work smoothly without any single hiccup. Transcoding of videos to 1080p is also possible, and you can stream on your TV.

With Plex, you can access any media on your smartphone or TV and enjoy from anywhere without a struggle. Besides, it has more features but once you bring it to your home and then you will understand what exactly a combination of NAS and Plex can do.

Buy: Synology NAS Price on Amazon

#5-ASUSTOR AS5304T NAS for Gaming

ASUSTOR is perfect tier NAS for Gaming purpose, we all know, heavy games are capable of damaging the entire system, if you don’t look up carefully. This NAS is power-packed with 4GB DDR4 RAM, 4GB eMMC Flash Memory, 1.5GHz Quad-Core processor and two 2.5GBe ports for faster operation on multimedia. To create extra space on your PC, it supports automatic backup from your PC remotely even from mobile phones, and so you can access the data across devices with real-time syncing features.

Besides, ASUSTOR is also compatible and offers service to set up up to 4 IP cameras whether it is of your home or office for surveillance, it is free to use service. It comes with a three-year warranty period offered by the brand and covers all the damages including repairing and replacing, as per their terms and conditions within the warranty period.

#6-ASUSTOR AS6208T 8 Bay Diskless NAS

So you might have one question what is the difference between ASUSTOR AS5304T & AS6208T, not to mention, the very huge difference is of price and you can guess, it is a highly upgraded version of the above NAS by ASUSTOR. This NAS comes with eight diskless bays which can make sure 128TB of heavy storage requires a one-time installation. With super fast 224MB/s read and 220MB/s write speed, it can boost up your productivity and save much time. Other than that there’s nothing more to mention that I already did in the above product.

It offers a total of four 1GB LAN ports at this price and LCD for a quick view. If needed, then upgrade the RAM, but it is limited to DDR3.

#7-NETGEAR Wi-Fi ROUTER- its Plex Compatible

NETGEAR’s router can blow up your mind with its exceptional features. The Quad-Stream Wi-Fi router is pre-loaded with 1.7GHz Quad-Processor and supports the Plex media server and Amazon Alexa. Even you can use Plex to access media from the external drive or NAS drive which is connected with NighthawkX10.

Nighthawk app is the one that will set up your router, and you can manage all complete router from your smartphone by just downloading this app.

A brief message describing your needs will help me prepare for the next update in this article.

Buy: Check Wi-Fi Router for Plex Media server Price on Amazon

Which is better Synology or QNAP?

Synology or QNAP? Both of them are best, you just need to find out what are your requirements and needs before buying NAS.

When compare Synology and QNAP based on size and structure, it actually varies from model to model, because the design is made looking at the capacity and disks, included in the NAS, so there’s no point in comparing the size and structure of NAS. However, still, you can check on and do some research to find the NAS that fits your desk, if you have spacious issues.

The next major comparison is OS, for which operating system you are buying NAS and for what purpose. Most of the NAS works absolutely well with macOS and Windows, if you are buying NAS for Linux or Ubuntu, probably you’ll need to dig deeper to check its compatibility. Not all the NAS works with Linux and Ubuntu.

PLEX Media Player- It is the most common reason, why people go for NAS. Being the prior need of all the users, most of the Synology and QNAP units offer PLEX Media Player support.

For a transcending point of view, I’ll recommend QNAP over Synology because of its great efficiency of working with PLEX Media Servers.

Premium Support is Free Now

We are happy to help you! Follow the next Step if Your Solution is not in this article, Submit this form without Sign Up, We will revert back to you via Personal Mail. In Form, Please Use the Description field to Mention our reference Webpage URL which you visited and Describe your problem in detail if possible. We covered your iPhone 11 Pro, iPhone 11 Pro Max, iPhone 11, iPhone 8(Plus), iPhone 7(Plus), iPhone 6S(Plus), iPhone 6(Plus), iPhone SE, SE 2(2020), iPhone 5S, iPhone 5, iPad All Generation, iPad Pro All Models, MacOS Catalina or Earlier MacOS for iMac, Mac Mini, MacBook Pro, WatchOS 6 & Earlier on Apple Watch 5/4/3/2/1, Apple TV. You can also mention iOS/iPadOS/MacOS. To be Continued..

Overall, I can’t define which NAS is best among Synology and QNAP, however, we are open for your questions, anytime if you are facing difficulties while choosing NAS, feel free to contact us.

Jaysukh Patel is the founder of howtoisolve. Also self Professional Developer, Techno lover mainly for iPhone, iPad, iPod Touch and iOS, Jaysukh is one of responsible person in his family.
Contact On: [email protected] [OR] [email protected]